There is growing unease over whether human stem cells could migrate to other parts of the animals, creating human sperm or eggs in their reproductive systems. Should two such "chimera mice" mate, it could lead to the nightmarish scenario of a human embryo trapped in a mouse's womb.
3.09.2005
3.08.2005
3.07.2005
"Excuse me, Mr. Bolton, but we're not taking your picture for the new Got Milk? ad until after the press conference..."
3.03.2005
3.02.2005
2.28.2005
2.25.2005
2.24.2005
2.23.2005
2.22.2005
Gone for good The Shins
Untie me, I've said no vowsIt's sort of erudite isn't it, what with the whole poison in the ear reference?
The train is getting way too loud
I gotta leave here my girl
Get on with my lonely life Just leave the ring on the rail
For the wheels to nullify Until this turn in my head
I let you stay and you paid no rent
I spent twelve long months on the lam That's enough sitting on the fence
For the fear of breaking dams I find a fatal flaw
In the logic of love
And go out of my head You love a sinking stone
That'll never elope
So get used to the lonesome
Girl, you must atone some
Don't leave me no phone number there It took me all of a year
To put the poison pill to your ear
But now I stand on honest ground, on honest ground You want to fight for this love
But honey you cannot wrestle a dove
So baby it's clear You want to jump and dance
But you sat on your hands
And lost your only chance Go back to your hometown
Get your feet on the ground
And stop floating around I find a fatal flaw
In the logic of love
And go out of my head You love a sinking stone
That'll never elope
So get used to used to the lonesome
Girl, you must atone some
Don't leave me no phone number there
2.21.2005
2.20.2005
2.18.2005
2.17.2005
One mother, who herself teaches Sunday school but nevertheless opted out of the program, explains it better than I ever could: "I asked them whether Jesus was a Christian and they said 'yes.' When I said, 'Jesus was a Jew,' one girl said, 'But Jesus was a good person.' "
2.16.2005
Vows to drive one another into the sea must be downgraded to vows to drive one another to the beach for a nice weekend.
2.15.2005
"What is, Can You Beat Ken?"
"Keep your half-octopus females to yourself!" says Giblets. "All they wanna do is digest Giblets and turn him into ink." "A good woman is like a fine cheese," says me. "Or a large hat. Or an aggrieved sasquatch. Or an elephant made outta trees an ropes an lotsa smaller elephants." "Giblets never wants to see another elephant again!" says Giblets. "He is done with them and their cheating hearts! He is burning all pianos!" "But you love the elephants," says me. "You can't live with em an you can't live without em." "Cause they tear out your liver an brains an replace em with the fungal herbs of the undead," says Giblets.
2.14.2005
2.13.2005
2.11.2005
2.10.2005
2.09.2005
2.08.2005
2.07.2005
2.04.2005
Moss in space
En garde! (avec parapluie) - Part 1 and Part 2 - The drawings alone are enough reason to check these out. ;)
Last but not least, some Super Bowl Super Bull
2.03.2005
2.02.2005
"The FAA Web site says the plane was registered to a company called 448 Alliance LLC, and gave an address in Dallas. Directory assistance has no company with that name, but does show a DDH Aviation at the same address. No one answered the phone there."Full article here.
2.01.2005
Don't get me wrong. I do see their point; they feel like it's a waste of time for their kids to be learning these "untruths" of science and history. Their tax dollars should go toward "meaningful" education. I still say buck up. It's not as though a high school biology class spends the entire year covering evolution. And when has a good debate ever been a waste of time? I think these people should be happy to have their kids involved in evolution discussions at school; if, when presented with all the information available, the kids still decide the Bible's account of human creation is the only real truth, at least now they've had the opportunity to hear the other argument. Their faith will be solidified, and they'll be able to fling more informed barbs at those nasty secularists.
1.31.2005
1.27.2005
1.26.2005
I almost feel like this article was written specifically to piss me off.
"Kirk generally keeps a tight rein on his interpersonal expenditures," Herman's longtime friend Ken Klein said. "Contributions of affection rarely exceed his own yearnings. Also, there was an exchange of liquid assets on the first date, which is suicide in this dating market. It's not the sort of thing that generally leads to a permanent merger."
1.25.2005
1.24.2005
1.23.2005
1.20.2005
Maureen Dowd is crazy. I'm pretty sure that she watched the inauguration* and cracked. Maybe I should say that she saw it coming and cracked.
*Inauguration n.- the ceremonial insertion of a large corkscrew into an orifice of the democratic party.
u: iwannaread p:thisbook
Check out the stuff about the "hair part theory"...pretty funny. (via Geekpress)
1.19.2005
"If you want to trust my snap judgment, buy this book: you'll be delighted. If you want to trust my more reflective second judgment, buy it: you'll be delighted but frustrated, troubled and left wanting more.
Or just go to the bookstore, look at the cover and let your neurons make up their own damn mind.
1.18.2005
1.17.2005
1.16.2005
1.14.2005
1.13.2005
A second study, which was by researchers at four British universities and reported last week, suggested that smart men with demanding jobs would rather have old-fashioned wives, like their mums, than equals. The study found that a high I.Q. hampers a woman's chance to get married, while it is a plus for men. The prospect for marriage increased by 35 percent for guys for each 16-point increase in I.Q.; for women, there is a 40 percent drop for each 16-point rise.u: iwannaread p: thisbook
1.12.2005
1.11.2005
1.10.2005
1.07.2005
1.06.2005
Here's a cool article about the aerial, "video game angle" cameras used at football games.
1.05.2005
Dude, where's my cohort?
I'm glad that my post below started some discussion, but I'm not done railing against the man. This time, I'm taking issue with the practice of advancing kids through school by age, rather than ability or accomplishment. Now, I must grant that advancement by age is a well established practice- in the sense that it's done nearly everywhere, and has been done for a long time. There seems to be very little else to recommend age-advancement, however. What arguments can be advanced in support of it?
Probably the first argument most will give relates to socialization. The idea is that kids of a given age will be better able to interact with each other. What supports this idea? It seems that children are certainly not of an age with their parents, and yet during childhood, they interact very well. Frequently they relate with their older or younger siblings, or even other family members of similar age. Children are so malleable that they can fit into nearly any situation- that's what they're made to do. What's more, when, outside of school as currently implemented, are people formed into groups solely on the basis of their ages? The idea that kids should be socialized in groups of homogeneous age seems like poor instruction for the future!
Another argument sometimes advanced regards the teachers: it is easier for teachers to deal with groups composed by age. Children of a particular age tend to be at a given developmental stage. There is certainly truth to that. However, a group of students of any age will have many individuals of differing development- teachers must still cope with the outliers! Also, remember that children are develping intellectually, emotionally, and physically- all at once. Should physical development- the most directly tied to age- be the factor setting the clock? Unless school really is to be glorified daycare, then the teachers ought to primarily be intellectual resources for their students. Hence, students' intellectual development should be paramount in advancing them.
This is not to say that school plays no role in instructing children in acceptable behavior. It's just that for the system of education to be at all effective in its mission- producing citizens capable of contributing to society and participating in our democracy- they must already have the rudiments of acceptable behavior upon entering. If they do not, and parents instead rely on the schools to instill their children with this essential knowledge, we end up with todays mess- teacher as babysitter/disciplinarian/instructor.
Digression: In the previous paragraph, I wrote that the mission of our education system is to produce productive citizens. The more cynical (read: realistic) among you will object that this was not the intent behind establishing said system. Rather, you'll say that the intent was to keep kids busy learning to accept authority until they reach their physical peak, at which point they'd be put to work. Or, you'll say that the point was to produce young adults with just enough education to participate in the manufacturing economy. That's all well and good (and probably true; I can also be cynical), but for the good of our world, those things can't be the mission of the education system (any more). Instead, it must be that we endeavor to give each citizen the tools to be productive and able to discharge their civic duty. It is not possible to stay a democracy if the people cannot understand the actions of their government (and the consequences of said).End Digression
It does not follow that education cannot be fun. While the acquisition of some of the skills can be dreary (reading, basic math), the exercise of those skills can be wonderful fun. The exercise of those skills- developing an appreciation of literature, music, art, science, film -whatever!- can even teach people about who they are, enabling them to express and create.